::: Welcome to Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife :::
 
17_c.gif 문헌정보
17_c.gif 야생동물관련 자료 및 소식
17_c.gif 종정보
17_c.gif 보전유전학/보전생물학 자료
17_c.gif 야생동물의학 소식 및 자료
  - 천연기념물의 대상
sound.gif 갤러리
sound.gif 자유게시판 (옛날 게시판)
sound.gif 관련사이트
sound.gif 자료실
sound.gif 찾아오시는 길
보전유전학/보전생물학 자료

View Article
Name
  운영자 2006-05-23 10:35:53 | Hit : 14624 | Vote : 2444
Subject   [자료] Conservation: Dollars and sense
News Feature
Nature 437, 614-616 (29 September 2005) | doi:10.1038/437614a

Conservation: Dollars and sense
L
ucy Odling-Smee1

Lucy Odling-Smee is a subeditor for Nature.


Top of pageAbstractApproaches to conservation that seek to protect the most endangered species have had only mixed success. Is it time to move away from biodiversity 'hotspots', and stress the economic value of ecosystems? Lucy Odling-Smee investigates.

The Florida panther is living on the edge. Once, these majestic cats prowled throughout the southeastern United States. But today, fewer than 90 of the creatures cling to fragments of habitat in southern Florida. And not everyone agrees that efforts to save this subspecies make economic or scientific sense.

Male Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi) stalk hunting grounds that average 550 square kilometres. Given the exorbitant cost of land in the Sunshine State, protecting sufficient habitat to support a population viable over the long term is a tall order. And although some argue that protecting the panther will rescue other threatened animals and plants along the way, this remains little more than an article of faith. Even the panther's evolutionary heritage has been called into question: genetic studies suggest that it is not as distinct from other subspecies of mountain lion as was once thought1.

Attempts to save the Florida panther epitomize an approach to conservation that is increasingly coming under fire. A new, hard-headed breed of conservationists say we should not concentrate exclusively on saving the rare and endangered or on protecting species diversity. Instead, they say, decisions need to be made within a rigorous economic framework. Some argue that the key to effective conservation is quantifying and promoting the economic 'services' that ecosystems provide for people — a mantra that has gained momentum with the completion this year of the most comprehensive survey yet of these benefits, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment2.

At the same time, conservationists are being urged to develop better tools to measure the effectiveness of their projects, and to share data on best practice. In other words, say critics, it's time for the organizations involved in conservation to admit that they are fallible, and to learn from past mistakes (see 'Taking quackery out of conservation').


http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v437/n7059/full/437614a.html
 Prev   [자료] Biodiversity needs the help of global change managers, not museum-keepers (Comment on "Dollar and sense")
운영자
  2006/05/23 
 Next   [소식] French Supreme Court tells bear releases must go on
운영자
  2006/05/15 


Copyright 1999-2019 Zeroboard / skin by daerew
151-742 서울특별시 관악구 신림9동 산56-1 서울대학교 수의과대학 85동 802호
Tel 02-888-2744, Fax 02-888-2754, E-mail cgrb@cgrb.org

Copyright © 2002-2004 CGRB All Rights Reserved