|
|
|
|
|
º¸ÀüÀ¯ÀüÇÐ/º¸Àü»ý¹°ÇÐ ÀÚ·á |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
¿î¿µÀÚ |
2006-09-18 11:06:05 | Hit : 28198 | Vote : 9666 |
|
|
|
|
Subject |
|
[ÀÚ·á] Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations |
|
|
|
|
Molecular Ecology (2003)12 ,2511 –2523 doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01928.x
Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
INVITED REVIEW
Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations
ADAM G.JONES * and WILLIAM R.ARDREN ¢Ó
*School of Biology,Georgia Institute of Technology,310 Ferst Drive,Atlanta,GA 30332 USA,¢ÓConservation Genetics Laboratory,
Abernathy Fish Technology Center,US Fish and Wildlife Service,1440 Abernathy Creek Road,Longview,WA 98632,USA
Abstract
The recent proliferation of hypervariable molecular markers has ushered in a surge of techniques for the analysis of parentage in natural and experimental populations. Consequently,the potential for meaningful studies of paternity and maternity is at an all-time high. However,the details and implementation of the multifarious techniques often differ
in subtle ways that can influence the results of parentage analyses. Now is a good time to reflect on the available techniques and to consider their strengths and weaknesses. Here, we review the leading techniques in parentage analysis,with a particular emphasis on those
that have been implemented in readily useable software packages. Our survey leads to some important insights with respect to the utility of the different approaches. This review should serve as a useful guide to anyone who wishes to embark on the study of parentage.
Keywords :exclusion, fractional allocation, likelihood, microsatellites, parentage analysis, paternity
Received 12 February 2003;revision received 8 May 2003;accepted 11 June 2003
http://www.bio.tamu.edu/USERS/ajones/parentage_files/JonesArdren2003MolEcolReview.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151-742 ¼¿ïƯº°½Ã °ü¾Ç±¸ ½Å¸²9µ¿ »ê56-1 ¼¿ï´ëÇб³ ¼öÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ 85µ¿ 802È£
Tel 02-888-2744, Fax 02-888-2754, E-mail cgrb@cgrb.org
Copyright © 2002-2004 CGRB All Rights Reserved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|