::: Welcome to Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife :::
 
17_c.gif ¹®ÇåÁ¤º¸
17_c.gif ¾ß»ýµ¿¹°°ü·Ã ÀÚ·á ¹× ¼Ò½Ä
17_c.gif Á¾Á¤º¸
17_c.gif º¸ÀüÀ¯ÀüÇÐ/º¸Àü»ý¹°ÇÐ ÀÚ·á
17_c.gif ¾ß»ýµ¿¹°ÀÇÇÐ ¼Ò½Ä ¹× ÀÚ·á
  - õ¿¬±â³ä¹°ÀÇ ´ë»ó
sound.gif °¶·¯¸®
sound.gif ÀÚÀ¯°Ô½ÃÆÇ (¿¾³¯ °Ô½ÃÆÇ)
sound.gif °ü·Ã»çÀÌÆ®
sound.gif ÀÚ·á½Ç
sound.gif Ã£¾Æ¿À½Ã´Â ±æ
º¸ÀüÀ¯ÀüÇÐ/º¸Àü»ý¹°ÇÐ ÀÚ·á

View Article
Name
  ¿î¿µÀÚ 2006-05-02 13:57:56 | Hit : 27657 | Vote : 9263
Subject   [ÀÚ·á] Conservation and control strategies for the wolf (Canis lupus) in western Europe based on demographic models.
C R Biol. 2003 Jun;326(6):575-87. Related Articles, Links  


Conservation and control strategies for the wolf (Canis lupus) in western Europe based on demographic models.

Chapron G, Legendre S, Ferriere R, Clobert J, Haight RG.

Laboratoire d'ecologie, CNRS UMR 7625, Ecole normale superieure, 46, rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris, France. gchapron@carnivoreconservation.org

Securing the long-term acceptance of large carnivores such as the wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe and North America raises a difficult challenge to conservation biologists: planning removals to reduce depredations on livestock while ensuring population viability. We use stochastic-stage-structured population models to investigate wolf population dynamics and to assess alternative management strategies. Among the various management strategies advocated by agencies, zoning that involves eliminating wolves outside a restricted area should be designed with caution, because probabilities of extinction are extremely sensitive to the maximum number of packs that a zone can support and to slight changes in stage specific survival probabilities. In a zoned population, viability is enhanced more by decreasing mortality rates in all classes than by increasing wolf zone size. An alternative to zoning is adaptive management, where there is no limit on pack number but population control can be operated whenever some predefined demographic conditions are met. It turns out that an adaptive management strategy that removes a moderate percentage (10%) of the population following each year of more than 5% of total population growth would provide visible actions addressing public concerns while keeping extinction probability low.

PMID: 14558477 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14558477&query_hl=7&itool=pubmed_docsum
 Prev   [ÀÚ·á] Evidence of genetic distinction and long-term population decline in wolves (Canis lupus) in the Italian Apennines.
¿î¿µÀÚ
  2006/05/02 
 Next   [ÀÚ·á] Pitfalls of applying adaptive management to a wolf population in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario.
¿î¿µÀÚ
  2006/05/02 


Copyright 1999-2024 Zeroboard / skin by daerew
151-742 ¼­¿ïƯº°½Ã °ü¾Ç±¸ ½Å¸²9µ¿ »ê56-1 ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ¼öÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ 85µ¿ 802È£
Tel 02-888-2744, Fax 02-888-2754, E-mail cgrb@cgrb.org

Copyright © 2002-2004 CGRB All Rights Reserved